Posted on September 24, 2019 9:58 AM

3 Action Items & Get Up to Date on the R.O.E. Act (S.1209)

by C.J. Williams

Summer is over, and the Fall has brought back the bill that's as problematic for pro-lifers as for those who are pro-choice. This is not the time to give in to apathy or distraction. S.1209 (the "R.O.E." Act) has not been dismissed by the Joint Committee on the Judiciary. The members of the committee are still taking testimony, still counting the numbers of calls they receive, and still undecided on what to do with this bill, whose provisions would radically reduce our medical standards of care for women, endanger our 12 and 13 year old  girls, and slash legal protection for infants born during botched abortions.

Neither pro-life nor pro-choice, S,1209 deserves a resounding no from voters, and our legislators.

But those legislators need to hear your voice, because the abortion business lobby is pressuring them fiercely.

Here's your brief update, and 3 action items. Put them on your calendar with a permanent marker.

S.1209 has not been changed, nor has it been approved and sent on to a vote in our legislature.

S.1209's provisions which abolish adult supervision for underage girls entering abortion facilities, and the removal of the requirement that late-term 2nd or 3rd trimester abortions be performed in hospitals continue to cause even our most pro-abortion representatives to waver on this bill.

S.1209 will not be heard again in public, which makes your contacting the committee in-person, via mail, email, and phone essential to educating them on the bill's dangers, and driving home the message you sent when you showed up in the hundreds at the June hearing.  


So TAKE 3 THIS WEEK: Completing this list will make a concrete difference in whether Massachusetts promotes abortion even over women's safety, and legalizes the passive killing of infants.

  1. If you've already submitted testimony, follow up by contacting Chair Claire Cronin and Vice-Chair Michael Day of the Joint Committee on the Judiciary. 
  2. If you have not submitted testimony, submit your statement today.
  3. Commit to calling each member of the committee one day this week and/or next during our Mobile Callbank (September 25 through October 9).


BONUS: Visit the the offices of the Joint Committee on the Judiciary this week or next. 

For easy reference:

Chair Rep. Claire Cronin

(617) 722-2396

Vice Chair Rep. Michael Day


Don't walk, run. There is nothing more critical to shelving this deadly bill than your non-stop vocal opposition.

Share the opportunity to reach our legislators with your friends, family, and neighbors, pro-life or pro-choice!








Posted on September 23, 2019 11:06 AM

3 Ways Walking (for Life) Benefits You and Saves Lives

Are you wondering: Why go walk for life Saturday? 


During the Civil Rights era, walking was the walk, and talk came after. Love is the only answer to the lie that women need violence to obtain equality.  Killing is not care. So what is? 

Love is a positive, not a negative reaction; and not just a label of pro-life that I pin on my sleeve.

 In his speech, "Walk for Freedom", Martin Luther King Jr. stated, "Love must be at the forefront of our movement if it is to be a successful movement. And when we speak of love, we speak of understanding, good will toward all men. We speak of a creative, a redemptive sort of love, so that as we look at the problem, we see that the real tension is not between the Negro citizens and the white citizens of Montgomery, but it is a conflict between justice and injustice [...]"

Our real tension is not between the people who label themselves pro-life or pro-choice. Our real tension lies in the conflict between commitment to love, or commitment to fear and violence, and the cycle of abuse.

So why walk this Saturday?

Because the power of presence is a power greater than any statement of fact, and any argument. It's the power of presence -- not argument or counseling -- that makes Planned Parenthood's no-show rate skyrocket to 70%+ when someone is simply standing on the sidewalk during abortion hours. Because presence is love. I'm here for you, is a statement that your life matters and has dignity. And that can only be acted; it cannot just be talked.

When I go out to walk for life, or to sidewalk counsel, I often speak to a fellow millennial who is pro-choice.

More often than not, we agree: Violence isn't how you solve problems. Equality can't be based in violence. Freedom can't be based in violence.

Abortion is violently dangerous to women subjected to it; and terminally dangerous on every level to the in-utero child subjected to it. But violence you don't see, or know about, is hard to oppose. That's why dialogue, and walks, make a difference.


Walks provide us, and our communities, with three integral ingredients for success in saving lives and changing society:


-- Break from isolation: Every movement for justice has had to unite at a massive level to oppose and expose systemic violence and injustice.

-- Break into the wider community: Every movement for human rights has had to reach, re-educate, and relate to the community at large.

-- Break the chain: Every movement for truth and restoration has had to break an entrenched system of thought and action rooted in a lie, and replace it with bonds of freedom and love. Your walk is a concrete way to re-forge relationships on the basis of love, not violence; openness, not fear; hope, not despair.



This weekend, do something that...


  1. Connects you with a like-minded community that puts love in action into action for the preborn, women, the vulnerable and marginalized
  2. Introduces you to the positive resources in your region for women facing unexpected or difficult pregnancies
  3. Demonstrates to the wider area and state the massive, loving, visible presence of the movement for human rights in the womb, and out of it, defying stereotypes



Walk with me in Western Mass.

For the preborn.

For the women.

For yourself.

Because we all suffer in a society based in violence; and we all deserve a world built in love and justice, free from violence.




Posted on September 19, 2019 1:28 PM

Abortion Rates Drop 24% in Massachusetts; Largest Decrease Recorded

Abortion rates have declined in the state of Massachusetts by 24% (2011-2018)

While abortion proponents, including Planned Parenthood's research arm, the Guttmacher Institute, propose various reasons for the steep decline, one obvious foundation for a drop in abortion is left out.

Women are receiving the support they need, and thus don't feel coerced into terminating a child.

This record-breaking drop in abortion could also be related to the growth and expansion of pregnancy resource centers, as well as a wider spread cultural shift that has more and more access to positive media, visual aids to the what humans look like, developing in-utero, and a millennial ethos that shies away from violence.

Massachusetts has opened 3-6 new pregnancy resource centers since this study began, including ClearWay Clinics in Worcester and Springfield.

Read more
Posted on September 19, 2019 8:44 AM

Call for Healthcare Professionals - Doctor Prescribed Suicide

We have a critical update about an action all health care providers in Massachusetts can take to stop the legalization of doctor-prescribed suicide and to save lives.  Please respond to this urgent update if you are a doctor, nurse, social worker, physical therapist, or pharmacist.

The time is of the essence. You have the opportunity to end this assault on human life before it begins.

Please respond as soon as possible so that we can contact you. Our longtime board member (and a director of The Patients Rights Action Fund in Massachusetts) Anne Fox, will be in touch.


You can offer your help by emailing

Yours for life,

The MCFL Team


Anne Fox

Posted on September 16, 2019 11:16 AM

Case on Abortionists Selling Human Body Parts Continues

by Terrisa Bukovinac
contributed to by C.J. Williams
Planned Parenthood sells human body parts from still-breathing infants. Investigative journalist, David Daleiden, proved it with his undercover work and videos.
Since then, PP has been rabidly pursuing him in court, and he faces almost life in prison if convicted.

Proceedings in the California's criminal case against David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt continue as prosecution tries to prove the investigative journalist was in the wrong, filming abortion providers who admit to selling human organs and body parts removed from still-living abortion children.
The past few days in court have revealed much about the character of David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt’s accusers. When shown a copy of the contract between StemExpress and Planned Parenthood, the CEO of StemExpress refused to accept it as legitimate and wouldn't answer questions about it. And when shown on paper that the written testimony she gave in a separate case contradicted an answer she gave in front of Judge Hite, she charged David's lawyers with doctoring the document. That's one way to get around exposing your company or perjuring yourself: just accuse Congress's Select Panel on Infant Lives and defense attorneys of manipulating records. 

Special Agent Brian Cardwell, who was originally tasked with investigating the claims of illegal recording of the "does," admitted under oath that he never challenged or properly investigated the claims, even when many of these conversations were held in busy settings like hotel lobbies and elevators. There was a total stranger present in the elevator with Daleiden and Doe 4, yet that video still became a part of this court case! It was also revealed that Cardwell didn't watch the videos he seized from Daleiden's apartment in full, yet he signed off on an arrest affidavit that said he saw no evidence of criminality on the part of Planned Parenthood.  

When Daleiden took the stand on Friday his motives for recording these videos were made very clear. His work history with Live Action, and growing knowledge of the world of fetal experimentation, showed that his intent was to embark on a journalistic project and catch criminals on hidden camera. One of the catalysts for the creation of the Center for Medical Progress was a 20/20 news report from the year 2000 that Daleiden saw in 2010 regarding fetal tissue trafficking. He noted that there wasn't any serious follow up in the 10 year period between the broadcast of this news story and his first viewing of it. The defense team demonstrated that David acted on a reasonable belief that crimes were being committed. Even if a secretly recorded conversation is confidential, it's not a violation of the law if the purpose was to expose violent crimes. 
Daleiden will again take the stand today, September 16th,  where he will be cross-examined by the prosecution. This is going to be a pivotal moment for the demise of Planned Parenthood. We must shine a spotlight on this case and not miss the valuable opportunity to bring visibility to the gruesome reality of the practices of the abortion industry. 

Share this article on all your social media channels to support Daleiden, and post on Facebook with a green background as all demonstrators in San Francisco will be out in green to reflect life. 
Posted on August 29, 2019 3:01 PM

Opposition to "R.O.E. Act" Grounded in Science & Common Sense

Why do citizens across the political spectrum oppose S.1209, the "R.O.E. Act"? Dr. Kerry Pound, Vice President of MCFL, illustrates why briefly and clearly in the following response to Rev. Robinson's strange conflation of religion with biology, and misunderstanding of the human development. The text below was published in The Cape Cod Times.


By Kerry Pound, M.D., Vice President, MCFL

I appreciate the Rev. Edmund’s Robinson’s Aug. 16 My View in response to my June 15 op-ed, “Two patients? Not according to the proposed ROE Act.” But I am unclear why he believes I have asserted any religious perspectives, given my arguments arose from science. I did not mention religious teachings in either my op-ed or in my testimony at the Statehouse.

Science recognizes the beginning of life as conception. The journal Nature published a study with the opening statement: “The life cycle of mammals begins when a sperm enters an egg.”

Perhaps Robinson’s argument was that I have conflated life with personhood. If we agree life starts at conception, what constitutes the claimed profound difference between a zygote and an adult? Only time and development. Clearly, a human conceptus is not going to become a “wart” or a cancerous growth, and certainly ought not to be treated as such.

Our law in Massachusetts already allows for abortion throughout the entire nine months of pregnancy for concerns of mother’s health and life. The NASTY Act passed last summer guarantees that abortion will remain available in the commonwealth even if federal law changes.

Why then is the ROE Act necessary? Plainly, it isn’t.


Posted on August 27, 2019 10:15 AM

Euphemisms that wipe out choices in doctor prescribed suicide

Why are people under doctor prescribed suicide laws called burdens, and saddled with euphemisms that paint their life as less "worth-it"?


By Mark Rollo, M.D., MCFL Board of Directors

A woman by the name of Kathryn Judson brought her husband to a doctor in Oregon.  He was ill and as soon as he entered the waiting room, he collapsed in a half-exhausted heap in the chair.  

Yes, he was a “burden” to her. Clearly, he needed to be carried, emotionally and physically. So, the doctor advised him to consider assisted suicide.  “Think of what it will spare your wife, we need to think of her,” he told them both.  In Oregon, doctor prescribed suicide is legal and encouraged. Yet the primary reason for Oregonians requesting lethal drugs is a feeling that they are burden to family and caregivers.   You see, being a burden is undignified.  Being helpless is being less-worth-it. Being ill is another way of being less human, clearly.

But  another doctor was obtained. He treated Kathryn’s husband as a valuable patient, and Kathryn’s husband lived five more years.

A culture of death is aided by corruption of language.  Euphemisms obsscure our ability to see the victims involved in doctor prescribed suicide, and erase the risks inherent in its advancement in our legislature.  

Read more
Posted on August 20, 2019 10:21 AM

Planned Parenthood Ditches Title X Funds in Favor of Abortion

According to their own estimates, Planned Parenthood performs over 330,000 abortion procedures per year. Apparently, that act of violence is their non-negotiable, because they've just voluntarily withdrawn from the program granting them funds through Title X. The organization receives approximately $60 million a year through Title X (which is less than 15% of the overall public funds given to the abortion giant); but in refusing Title X, Planned Parenthood is brazenly stating that abortion matters more than women's healthcare.

Most of other government funding comes through Medicaid, which does cover human abortions. 

Despite what leadership in Planned Parenthood has stated, no part of the current federal administration is forcing PP to forgo Title X funds. The rule does not target any particular organization; the rule is a blanket policy that guarantees Title X monies (federal funds) follow rules instated already by the HHS which bar abortion funding. The recent decision follows the ruling that now separates abortion from actual healthcare, and prohibits any organization providing healthcare from receiving federal funding if they also provide abortion. As of the writing of this article, courts support the decision, despite lawsuits from PP.

Unbiased observers have made a good point quietly between the shouts on both sides of this news story: Does PP have a deeper commitment to making a profit off killing the preborn, or to women's health? Is it "Care. No Matter What." or "Abort. No Matter What."?


Read more
Posted on August 13, 2019 11:02 AM

Doctor prescribed suicide gives doctors the right to kill

Doctor Prescribed Suicide does not give patients the right to die; it gives doctors the right to kill

By Dr. Mark Rollo, Board of Directors, MCFL

Giving doctors the right to kill is dangerous.

Take Kate Cheney for instance.  She was an eighty five year old Oregonian with terminal cancer.  Her daughter, Erika, brought Kate to her physician to ask about assisted suicide.  However, Kate had mild dementia and her physician refused to prescribe suicide pills because he felt she lacked the capacity to understand the process.

Erika then engaged in "doctor shopping."  She took her mother to see a psychiatrist who rejected the request for assisted suicide on the same grounds as the former doctor, saying that Kate lacked the ability to weigh options about assisted suicide. The psychiatrist noted that Erika seemed coercive.

Undeterred, Erika continued to shop and took her mother to an “ethicist” at the HMO who determined that Kate was cognitively able to request suicide pills. Thus, poison was prescribed despite the obvious conflict of interest.  You see, Kate would no longer be an expense for the HMO if she were dead. After initial reluctance, Kate consumed the suicide cocktail. She had just spent a week in a nursing home, alone.

Kate is one of many people in Oregon who have been steered toward suicide.  This has been documented in the New England Journal of Medicine where patients doctor-shopped for suicide until they got what they wanted . . . . or what their family wanted for them.

It is estimated that about 10% of the elderly in Massachusetts are subject to abuse.  Doctor prescribed suicide is the perfect recipe for carrying out that abuse while simultaneously saving money for the health insurance carrier and providing the lure of a quick inheritance to family members.

All patients have the right to refuse care and take advantage of palliative care or hospice.  Doctor prescribed suicide is different. This act corrupts medicine by making the doctor, who should be committed to healing, complicit in killing.

Doctor prescribed suicide is dangerous indeed.  

Who would be the first Kate Cheney of Massachusetts to die at the hands of a “healer?”  

Bills that are before the Massachusetts joint committee on public health, S.1208 and H. 1926; “An act relative to end of life options,” would fuel elder abuse in Massachusetts and must be defeated.


Mark J Rollo, MD


Posted on August 13, 2019 10:16 AM

Taxpayer Funded Discrimination (Campaign Against Taxpayer Funded Abortion)

In Massachusetts, the killing of preborn people through abortion is publicly funded. This not only means the government is paying to kill its most vulnerable citizens, it also means you, as a citizen, have no choice about supporting deadly discrimination in our state.

Because this tax law infringes on your rights, and threatens the lives of our women and children, we have thrown our full support behind the Campaign to End Taxpayer Funded Abortion in MA. 

You can find the legal requirements involved in removing this insanity from our state constitution here.  In the meantime, join the campaign beginning this Fall to collect the signatures, the first step in the process of restoring our rights to pay for life, not death, in the Commonwealth.

Trainings will be scheduled for the upcoming month soon. 

Please email us with questions or to host your own.


We encourage you, however, to sign up to volunteer in the Fall regardless of whether you've attended an official training! Register to collect signatures: I'm in!


As always, your generous contributions to our work are what give our team the means to change hearts, laws, and minds -- and save lives -- in Massachusetts. Please consider donating today here to support our campaign.

Read more